But unlike the MD-10, they still have their flight engineers. Military KC-135 and 707-based variants got multiple updates, including EFIS screens. The latter had a flight engineer, and got few updates no EFIS and certainly not an eliminated flight engineer. Some see the 737 as a radical update of the 727. We also don’t really have many examples of aircraft that transitioned from three to two cockpit crew, between different generations. However the name ‘DC-10’ had stuck, since the jet’s development had began before the merger. Technically, the DC-10 should have been the ‘MD-10’ to begin with, because it came some years after the merger. ‘MD’ was for McDonnell Douglas, after the merger between Douglas and McDonnell. The ‘DC’ designation applied to Douglas aircraft. Photo: Eddie Maloney, CC BY-SA 2.0įirst of all, it is a bit odd that the DC-10 had the name it had. The DC-10 fared reasonably well, evolving into the MD-11 much later. The 747 was unquestionably the most successful. While most people came to associate the term ‘Jumbo’ with the latter, initially it applied to all three widebody designs. The other two were the Lockheed L-1011 Tristar and of course Boeing’s 747. Many people know of the DC-10 and the MD-11 tri-jets, but where does the MD-10 designation comes from? And how is it special?Īs many aviation enthusiasts know, the DC-10 tri-jet was one of the three original “Jumbos”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |